American Vs. Japanese Management Styles

A Japanese company and an American company decided to have acanoe race on the Missouri river. Both the teams practicedhard and long to reach their peak performance before the race. On the big day the Japanese won by a mile.

Afterwards the American team became very discouraged and
morally depressed. The American management decided that the reason for the crushing defeat had to be found. A "Management Team" made up of senior management was formed.They investigate and recommend appropriate action.

Their conclusion was that Japanese had 8 people rowing and 1
person steering, while the American team had 8 persons steering and one person rowing.

So American management hired a consulting company and paid
them incredible amount of money. They advised that too many people were steering the boat and not enough people were rowing.

To prevent losing to the Japanese again next year, the
rowing team's management structure was totally reorganized
to 4 steering supervisors, 3 area steering superintendents
and 1 assistant superintendent steering manager. They also
implemented a new performance system that would give the 1
person rowing the boat greater incentive to work harder.

It was called the "Rowing Team Quality First Program", with
meetings, dinners, and free pens for the rower. "We must give the rower the empowerment and enrichments through this
quality program".

The next year the Japanese won by two miles. Humiliated,
the American management laid off the rower for poor performance, halted development of a new canoe, sold the paddles, and cancelled all capital investments for new equipment. Then they distributed the money saved as bonuses to the senior executives.